[Comment "auto-generated from http://www.jesseo.com/chesspublishing/pgn.php?pgndata=[Event%20%26quot;Winawer%20Portisch%20Hook%20analysis%26quot;]%0A[Site%20%26quot;Chesspub%26quot;]%0A[Date%20%26quot;2015.01.01%26quot;]%0A[Round%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[White%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[Black%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[Result%20%26quot;*%26quot;]%0A[EventDate%20%26quot;2015.01.01%26quot;]%0A%0A1.e4%20e6%202.d4%20d5%203.Nc3%20Bb4%204.e5%20c5%205.a3%20Bxc3+%206.bxc3%20Qa5%207.Bd2%20Qa4%208.Qg4%20Kf8%209.Qd1%20b6%2010.dxc5%20bxc5%2011.Nf3%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%2011.c4!?%20%26%23123;Steers%20the%20game%20towards%20more%20concrete%20play%20and%20prevents%20the%20closed%20structure%20after%20c5-c4.%26%23125;%2011...Ba6%2012.cxd5%20Bxf1%2013.Qf3%20%26%23123;Taking%20the%20bishop%20directly%20looks%20toothless.%26%23125;%2013...exd5%2014.Qxd5%20Bxg2%2015.Qxg2%20Nc6%20%26%23123;White%20should%20look%20through%20the%20different%20continuations%20from%20this%20point.%20Checking%20briefly%20I%20wonder%20if%20not%20something%20like:%26%23125;%2016.Ne2%20Nge7%2017.Rg1%20Rg8%2018.Qf3!%20Qc4%2019.Rg4%20%26%23123;Can%20keep%20some%20initiative%20for%20white.%26%23125;%20)%0A11...c4!?%20%26%23123;Quite%20a%20move.%20It%20looks%20to%26nbsp;%20give%20black%20an%20uninspiring%20position,%20although%20perhaps%20much%20more%20importantly%20it%20will%20enable%20him%20to%20develop%20peacefully.%26%23125;%2012.Nd4%20%26%23123;I%20doubt%20white%20can%20get%20anything%20without%20moving%20the%20knight%20and%20including%20f4%20in%20his%20setup.%26%23125;%2012...Ne7%2013.Be2%20Nbc6%2014.f4%20h6!?%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%2014...g6%2015.O-O%20Rb8%2016.Be1%20%26%23123;I%20find%20sufficiently%20likeable%20for%20white.%26%23125;%20)%0A15.O-O%20Kg8%2016.Be3%20Kh7!?%20%26%23123;Black%20still%20looks%20solid%20and%20by%20getting%20king%20out%20of%20the%20way%20he%20has%20improved%20the%20harmony%20of%20his%20position.%20Basically%20white%20needs%20some%20kind%20of%20plan.%26%23125;%20*%0A"]
[Event "Winawer Portisch Hook analysis"]
[Site "Chesspub"]
[Date "2015.01.01"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[EventDate "2015.01.01"]

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Qa5 7.Bd2 Qa4 8.Qg4 Kf8 9.Qd1 b6 10.dxc5 bxc5 11.Nf3 
    ( 11.c4!? {Steers the game towards more concrete play and prevents the closed structure after c5-c4.} 11...Ba6 12.cxd5 Bxf1 13.Qf3 {Taking the bishop directly looks toothless.} 13...exd5 14.Qxd5 Bxg2 15.Qxg2 Nc6 {White should look through the different continuations from this point. Checking briefly I wonder if not something like:} 16.Ne2 Nge7 17.Rg1 Rg8 18.Qf3! Qc4 19.Rg4 {Can keep some initiative for white.} )
11...c4!? {Quite a move. It looks to  give black an uninspiring position, although perhaps much more importantly it will enable him to develop peacefully.} 12.Nd4 {I doubt white can get anything without moving the knight and including f4 in his setup.} 12...Ne7 13.Be2 Nbc6 14.f4 h6!? 
    ( 14...g6 15.O-O Rb8 16.Be1 {I find sufficiently likeable for white.} )
15.O-O Kg8 16.Be3 Kh7!? {Black still looks solid and by getting king out of the way he has improved the harmony of his position. Basically white needs some kind of plan.} *