[Comment "auto-generated from http://www.jesseo.com/chesspublishing/pgn.php?pgndata=[Event%20%26quot;Anti%20Kalashnikov%203.Nc3%20e5%26quot;]%0A[Site%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[Date%20%26quot;2015.01.01%26quot;]%0A[Round%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[White%20%26quot;9.Qe1%26quot;]%0A[Black%20%26quot;8...Bg4%26quot;]%0A[Result%20%26quot;*%26quot;]%0A[EventDate%20%26quot;2015.01.01%26quot;]%0A%0A1.e4%20c5%202.Nf3%20Nc6%203.Nc3%20e5%204.Bc4%20Be7%205.d3%20d6%206.O-O%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%206.Nd2%20%26%23123;Is%20the%20other%20main%20line.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%206.Ng5%20Bxg5%207.Qh5%20Be7%208.Qxf7+%20Kd7%20%26%23123;With%20speculative%20compensation.%26%23125;%20)%0A6...Nf6%207.Ng5%20O-O%208.f4%20Bg4!?%20%26%23123;One%20can%20consider%20other%20moves%20here%20as%20well,%20but%20this%20feels%20very%20natural.%26%23125;%209.Qe1%20%26%23123;9.Nf3%20and%209.Qd2%20are%20dealt%20with%20in%20the%20book.%20This%20move%20feels%20more%20threatening%20as%20white%20now%20has%20Qh4,%20which%20can%20create%20some%20pressure%20on%20black%27s%20kingside.%26%23125;%209...h6%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%209...Nd4?!%2010.Qh4!?%20%26%23123;With%20initiative.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%209...exf4%2010.Bxf4%20Qd7%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010...h6%2011.Nf3%20a6%2012.Nd5%20b5%2013.Bb3%20Be6%2014.c3%20%26%23123;White%20should%20have%20a%20nibble.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010...Nd4%2011.Qd2!?%20h6%2012.Nf3%20%26%23123;White%27s%20position%20looks%20a%20bit%20more%20harmonious.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%2011.h3%20Be6%2012.Nxe6!?%20fxe6%2013.e5%20dxe5%2014.Bxe5%20Nd5%2015.Rxf8+%20Rxf8%20%26%23123;White%20has%20the%20mildly%20more%20pleasant%20position.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%209...Bh5!?%20%26%23123;This%20move%20seems%20mostly%20justified.%20Probably%20it%20does%20not%20quite%20equalise%20in%20all%20continuations%20though.%26%23125;%2010.f5%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010.Qh4%20exf4%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;(%2010...h6%2011.Nd5%20%26%23123;Looks%20to%20give%20white%20decent%20chances%20for%20advantage.%20%26%23125;)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%2011.Bxf4%20Bg6%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;(%2011...h6%2012.Nh3%20Ne5%2013.Bxe5%20dxe5%2014.Nd5%20Nxd5%2015.Qxh5%20Ne3%2016.Bxf7+%20%26%23123;White%20is%20slightly%20better.%20%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%2012.Qe1%20%26%23123;Sad,%20but%20white%20had%20no%20decent%20way%20forward%20on%20the%20kingside.%26%23125;%2012...Na5%2013.Bd5%20Nxd5%2014.Nxd5%20Bxg5%2015.Bxg5%20Qxg5%2016.Qxa5%20f5%20%26%23123;With%20sufficient%20play%20for%20black.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010.h3%20exf4%2011.Bxf4%20h6%2012.Nf3%20Bxf3%2013.Rxf3%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;(%2013.gxf3%20Nh5%2014.Bh2%20Qd7%2015.Nd5%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%2015.Kg2%20Nd4%20%26%23123;Unclear/Equal.%20Black%20is%20well%20developed%20and%20reasonably%20active,%20so%20I%20think%20he%20should%20be%20fine.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;15...Qxh3%2016.Nxe7+%20Nxe7%2017.Bxd6%20%26%23123;Unclear.%20White%27s%20king%20is%20a%20bit%20weak%20so%20I%20doubt%20he%20has%20that%20good%20chances%20for%20advantage.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%2013...Nd4%2014.Rf2%20Nh5%20%26%23123;Transposes%20to%20the%20Killer%20Sicilian%20page%20282.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010.fxe5%20dxe5%2011.Qh4%20Bg6%2012.Qf2%20Na5%2013.Qe2%20Nxc4%2014.dxc4%20%26%23123;Black%20is%20solid.%20White%27s%20position%20appeals%20to%20me%20a%20bit%20more%20though.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010.Nf3%20Bxf3%2011.gxf3%20Nh5%20%26%23123;Black%20is%20OK.%20The%20dark%20squares%20are%20his.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%2010...Nd4%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%26nbsp;%20(%2010...Rb8%2011.Qh4!?%20h6%2012.Nf3%20Nd4%2013.Nxd4%20%26%23123;Looks%20a%20bit%20more%20comfortable%20for%20white.%26%23125;%20)%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%2011.Qf2!?%20a6%2012.a4%20Rb8%2013.a5%20%26%23123;White%20has%20some%20grip%20on%20the%20position.%26%23125;%20)%0A10.h3%20Bh5%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%2010...Bd7%2011.Nf3%20exf4%2012.Bxf4%20Be6%20%26%23123;Should%20be%20somewhat%20preferable%20for%20white.%26%23125;%20)%0A11.g4%20%0A%26nbsp;%20%26nbsp;%20(%2011.Nf3%20Bxf3%2012.Rxf3%20Nd4%2013.Rf2%20exf4%2014.Bxf4%20Nh5%20%26%23123;Transposes%20to%20the%20Killer%20Sicilian%20page%20282.%26%23125;%20)%0A11...hxg5%2012.fxg5%20Nh7%2013.gxh5%20Bxg5%2014.Qg3%20Bxc1%2015.Raxc1%20Qg5%2016.Qxg5%20Nxg5%2017.Kh2%20%26%23123;I%27m%20not%20sure%20I%20like%20this%20for%20black.%20White%27s%20pieces%20look%20mostly%20better%20than%20their%20black%20counterparts%20and%20black%20has%20little%20play.%26%23125;%20*"]
[Event "Anti Kalashnikov 3.Nc3 e5"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2015.01.01"]
[Round "?"]
[White "9.Qe1"]
[Black "8...Bg4"]
[Result "*"]
[EventDate "2015.01.01"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 e5 4.Bc4 Be7 5.d3 d6 6.O-O 
    ( 6.Nd2 {Is the other main line.} )
    ( 6.Ng5 Bxg5 7.Qh5 Be7 8.Qxf7+ Kd7 {With speculative compensation.} )
6...Nf6 7.Ng5 O-O 8.f4 Bg4!? {One can consider other moves here as well, but this feels very natural.} 9.Qe1 {9.Nf3 and 9.Qd2 are dealt with in the book. This move feels more threatening as white now has Qh4, which can create some pressure on black's kingside.} 9...h6 
    ( 9...Nd4?! 10.Qh4!? {With initiative.} )
    ( 9...exf4 10.Bxf4 Qd7 
        ( 10...h6 11.Nf3 a6 12.Nd5 b5 13.Bb3 Be6 14.c3 {White should have a nibble.} )
        ( 10...Nd4 11.Qd2!? h6 12.Nf3 {White's position looks a bit more harmonious.} )
    11.h3 Be6 12.Nxe6!? fxe6 13.e5 dxe5 14.Bxe5 Nd5 15.Rxf8+ Rxf8 {White has the mildly more pleasant position.} )
    ( 9...Bh5!? {This move seems mostly justified. Probably it does not quite equalise in all continuations though.} 10.f5 
        ( 10.Qh4 exf4 
            ( 10...h6 11.Nd5 {Looks to give white decent chances for advantage. })
        11.Bxf4 Bg6 
            ( 11...h6 12.Nh3 Ne5 13.Bxe5 dxe5 14.Nd5 Nxd5 15.Qxh5 Ne3 16.Bxf7+ {White is slightly better. } )
        12.Qe1 {Sad, but white had no decent way forward on the kingside.} 12...Na5 13.Bd5 Nxd5 14.Nxd5 Bxg5 15.Bxg5 Qxg5 16.Qxa5 f5 {With sufficient play for black.} )
        ( 10.h3 exf4 11.Bxf4 h6 12.Nf3 Bxf3 13.Rxf3 
            ( 13.gxf3 Nh5 14.Bh2 Qd7 15.Nd5 
                ( 15.Kg2 Nd4 {Unclear/Equal. Black is well developed and reasonably active, so I think he should be fine.} )
            15...Qxh3 16.Nxe7+ Nxe7 17.Bxd6 {Unclear. White's king is a bit weak so I doubt he has that good chances for advantage.} )
        13...Nd4 14.Rf2 Nh5 {Transposes to the Killer Sicilian page 282.} )
        ( 10.fxe5 dxe5 11.Qh4 Bg6 12.Qf2 Na5 13.Qe2 Nxc4 14.dxc4 {Black is solid. White's position appeals to me a bit more though.} )
        ( 10.Nf3 Bxf3 11.gxf3 Nh5 {Black is OK. The dark squares are his.} )
    10...Nd4 
        ( 10...Rb8 11.Qh4!? h6 12.Nf3 Nd4 13.Nxd4 {Looks a bit more comfortable for white.} )
    11.Qf2!? a6 12.a4 Rb8 13.a5 {White has some grip on the position.} )
10.h3 Bh5 
    ( 10...Bd7 11.Nf3 exf4 12.Bxf4 Be6 {Should be somewhat preferable for white.} )
11.g4 
    ( 11.Nf3 Bxf3 12.Rxf3 Nd4 13.Rf2 exf4 14.Bxf4 Nh5 {Transposes to the Killer Sicilian page 282.} )
11...hxg5 12.fxg5 Nh7 13.gxh5 Bxg5 14.Qg3 Bxc1 15.Raxc1 Qg5 16.Qxg5 Nxg5 17.Kh2 {I'm not sure I like this for black. White's pieces look mostly better than their black counterparts and black has little play.} *