[Comment "auto-generated from http://www.jesseo.com/chesspublishing/pgn.php?pgndata=[Event%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[Site%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[Date%20%26quot;2014.07.03%26quot;]%0A[Round%20%26quot;?%26quot;]%0A[White%20%26quot;%20%26quot;]%0A[Black%20%26quot;%26quot;]%0A[Result%20%26quot;*%26quot;]%0A[ECO%20%26quot;B03%26quot;]%0A[Annotator%20%26quot;Lee,Kam%26quot;]%0A[PlyCount%20%26quot;54%26quot;]%0A%0A1.%20e4%20Nf6%202.%0Ae5%20Nd5%203.%20d4%20d6%204.%20c4%20Nb6%205.%20exd6%20cxd6%206.%20Nc3%20g6%207.%20Be3%20Bg7%208.%20Rc1%20O-O%209.%20b3%0ABf5%2010.%20Be2%20%26%23123;Was%20recommended%20by%20Tom%20Rendle%20in%20his%20monthly%201.e4%20....%20post%0Aduring%20August,%202013.%20I%20think%2010.Be2%20is%20better%20than%2010.Nf3,%20but%20some%20lines%20are%0Atransposable%20between%20each%20other.%20The%20alternative%2010.d5%20is%20still%20the%20critical%0Aline%20and%20black%20should%20also%20be%20prepared%20against%20the%20positional%2010.Bd3.%26%23125;%20e5%20(%26%23123;%0AWas%20discussed%20by%20Tom.%26%23125;%2010...%20d5%2011.%20c5%20Nc8%2012.%20Bf3%20Nc6%2013.%20Bxd5%20e5%2014.%20Bxc6%0Abxc6%2015.%20Nf3)%20(10...%20Nc6%2011.%20d5%20Ne5%2012.%20f4%20Ned7%2013.%20Nf3%20Nc5%20$16%20%26%23123;Gavrilov,A%20%0A(2496)-Chetverik,%20M%20(2272),%20St%20Petersburg%202012.%26%23125;%2014.%20O-O%20Nbd7%2015.%20Nd4%20Ne4%2016.%0ANcb5%20$5%20%26%23123;My%20recommendation%20for%20white%26%23125;%20Ndf6%2017.%20Nxf5%20gxf5%2018.%20Qd3%20$16%20%26%23123;The%0Ablack%20kingside%20pawn%20structure%20is%20a%20bit%20mangled%20and%20there%20is%20no%20compensation.%26%23125;)%0A11.%20Nf3%20e4%20(11...%20Na6%2012.%20O-O%20%26%23123;White%20has%20successfully%20maintained%20the%20c4,d4%0Acentral%20pawn%20formation%20and%20black%20is%20running%20out%20of%20good%20moves.%26%23125;%20Qe7%2013.%20Re1%0ARfe8%2014.%20a4%20e4%2015.%20Nd2%20h5%2016.%20h3%20$16%20%26%23123;Black%27%20s%20chances%20of%20a%20successful%20kingside%0Aattack%20are%20small,%20because%20the%20black%20knights%20are%20on%20the%20wrong%20side%20of%20the%20board.%0AWhite%20will%20continue%20to%20grab%20space%20on%20the%20queenside.%26%23125;)%2012.%20Ng5%20%26%23123;The%20knight%20is%0Aapplying%20pressure%20on%20the%20black%20e4%20pawn%20and%20looking%20for%20the%20opportunity%20to%20jump%0Ato%20e6%20if%20the%20black%20f6%20pawn%20tries%20to%20chase%20away%20the%20probing%20knight.%26%23125;%20Nc6%2013.%20O-O%0A$5%20%26%23123;Black%20needs%20to%20be%20vigilant%20against%20losing%20a%20pawn%20without%20compensation%20and%0Aagainst%20making%20too%20many%20structural%20defects.%26%23125;%20Nxd4%2014.%20Bxd4%20Qxg5%2015.%20Bxg7%20Bh3%20$5%0A16.%20Bg4%20Bxg4%2017.%20Nxe4%20Bxd1%2018.%20Nxg5%20Kxg7%2019.%20Rfxd1%20Rad8%20%26%23123;Black%20has%20the%0Aunpleasant%20task%20of%20defending%20with%20a%20slightly%20inferior%20pawn%20structure,%20but%20has%0Agood%20chances%20to%20save%20the%20game.%26%23125;%2020.%20Rd2%20(20.%20Ne4%20d5%2021.%20cxd5%20Nxd5%2022.%20Rd2%20Nf4%0A$11)%2020...%20Rd7%2021.%20Rcd1%20Rfd8%2022.%20Nf3%20(22.%20Ne4%20d5%2023.%20cxd5%20Rxd5%20$11)%2022...%20d5%0A23.%20Ne5%20Rc7%2024.%20f4%20f6%2025.%20Ng4%20Rcd7%2026.%20c5%20Nc8%2027.%20Ne3%20Ne7%20$14%20%26%23123;The%20white%20king%0Acannot%20successfully%20attack%20the%26nbsp;%20black%20d5%20pawn%20and%20it%20cannot%20easily%20approach%0Athe%20black%20pawn%20via%20other%20squares%20.%26%23125;%20%0A%0A"]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014.07.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White " "]
[Black ""]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B03"]
[Annotator "Lee,Kam"]
[PlyCount "54"]

1. e4 Nf6 2.
e5 Nd5 3. d4 d6 4. c4 Nb6 5. exd6 cxd6 6. Nc3 g6 7. Be3 Bg7 8. Rc1 O-O 9. b3
Bf5 10. Be2 {Was recommended by Tom Rendle in his monthly 1.e4 .... post
during August, 2013. I think 10.Be2 is better than 10.Nf3, but some lines are
transposable between each other. The alternative 10.d5 is still the critical
line and black should also be prepared against the positional 10.Bd3.} e5 ({
Was discussed by Tom.} 10... d5 11. c5 Nc8 12. Bf3 Nc6 13. Bxd5 e5 14. Bxc6
bxc6 15. Nf3) (10... Nc6 11. d5 Ne5 12. f4 Ned7 13. Nf3 Nc5 $16 {Gavrilov,A 
(2496)-Chetverik, M (2272), St Petersburg 2012.} 14. O-O Nbd7 15. Nd4 Ne4 16.
Ncb5 $5 {My recommendation for white} Ndf6 17. Nxf5 gxf5 18. Qd3 $16 {The
black kingside pawn structure is a bit mangled and there is no compensation.})
11. Nf3 e4 (11... Na6 12. O-O {White has successfully maintained the c4,d4
central pawn formation and black is running out of good moves.} Qe7 13. Re1
Rfe8 14. a4 e4 15. Nd2 h5 16. h3 $16 {Black' s chances of a successful kingside
attack are small, because the black knights are on the wrong side of the board.
White will continue to grab space on the queenside.}) 12. Ng5 {The knight is
applying pressure on the black e4 pawn and looking for the opportunity to jump
to e6 if the black f6 pawn tries to chase away the probing knight.} Nc6 13. O-O
$5 {Black needs to be vigilant against losing a pawn without compensation and
against making too many structural defects.} Nxd4 14. Bxd4 Qxg5 15. Bxg7 Bh3 $5
16. Bg4 Bxg4 17. Nxe4 Bxd1 18. Nxg5 Kxg7 19. Rfxd1 Rad8 {Black has the
unpleasant task of defending with a slightly inferior pawn structure, but has
good chances to save the game.} 20. Rd2 (20. Ne4 d5 21. cxd5 Nxd5 22. Rd2 Nf4
$11) 20... Rd7 21. Rcd1 Rfd8 22. Nf3 (22. Ne4 d5 23. cxd5 Rxd5 $11) 22... d5
23. Ne5 Rc7 24. f4 f6 25. Ng4 Rcd7 26. c5 Nc8 27. Ne3 Ne7 $14 {The white king
cannot successfully attack theĀ  black d5 pawn and it cannot easily approach
the black pawn via other squares .}