[Comment "auto-generated from http://www.jesseo.com/chesspublishing/pgn.php?pgndata=%0A1.%20d4%20f5%202.%20e4%20fxe4%203.%20Nc3%20Nf6%204.%20Bg5%20Nc6%205.%20Nh3%EF%BF%BD%20d5%206.%20Bxf6%EF%BF%BD%20Bxh3!%207.Qh5+%20g6%208.%20Qxh3%20!?%26%23123;(Lightly%20discussed%20in%20the%20first%20game%20on%20my%20blog)%26%23125;%20exf6%209.%20Qe6+%20Ne7%20%26%23123;(On%20my%20blog%20I%20deviate%20with%20this%20move)%26%23125;%2010.f3%20exf3%2011.Qxf6%20Nc6%20!%26%23123;(In%20my%20analysis%20of%202004%20i%20indicated%20f2%20as%20strong%20but%20today%20I%20believe%20it%20only%20leads%20to%20equalty.%EF%BF%BD%20This%20surprising%20sacrifice%20ameliorates.)%26%23125;"]

1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Nc6 5. Nh3� d5 6. Bxf6� Bxh3! 7.Qh5+ g6 8. Qxh3 !?{(Lightly discussed in the first game on my blog)} exf6 9. Qe6+ Ne7 {(On my blog I deviate with this move)} 10.f3 exf3 11.Qxf6 Nc6 !{(In my analysis of 2004 i indicated f2 as strong but today I believe it only leads to equalty.� This surprising sacrifice ameliorates.)}